It’s difficult to know which is more absurd – the German justice system or the British press.
We don’t know the man concerned and it’s possible he is in very good health for his age, but for anything like a fair trial to be possible one would have to believe in a frankly impossible set of circumstances: that this 100-year-old is mentally and physically capable of answering detailed questions accurately about the events of more than eighty years ago, and that either witnesses with similar remarkable memories exist, or some sort of accurate documentary record exists.
The truth is that this is a political prosecution, just like the prosecutions of historians, scientists and publishers who dare to dispute the orthodox version of the ‘Holocaust’.
It doesn’t matter whether you are in your 90s, like the late Ursula Haverbeck; in your 20s, like Isabel Peralta; or somewhere in between, like Germar Rudolf – the authorities in the Federal Republic will try to criminalise you for your historical and/or political views.
Similarly, normal standards of justice and constitutional rights do not apply to a 100-year-old who is lucky or unlucky enough to be one of the last survivors of a better Germany in the cartoon ‘democracy’ of today.
But the absurdity doesn’t end here.
So as to explain this story to their intellectually limited readers on both sides of the Atlantic, the Daily Mail tells us that the 100-year-old is said to have served at Stalag VI-A in Hemer, western Germany, which “provided the plot line for part of the WWII film Hart’s War, starring Bruce Willis, which tells the story of American war prisoner Nicholas Katzenbach.”
No it doesn’t.
Hart’s War is a novel, not a work of history – and the film is similarly a work of fiction.
It so happens that this novel’s author was the son of Nicholas Katzenbach, a New Jersey lawyer and politician best known for serving in President Lyndon Johnson’s administration from 1964-69, latterly as Under Secretary of State.
Katzenbach was a prisoner-of-war – in a different camp Stalag Luft III, which features in a different film The Great Escape – but there has never been any suggestion that Hart’s War tells his story, nor has there ever been any suggestion that Katzenbach had any knowledge of “war crimes”, “crimes against humanity”, etc.
The fictional tale Hart’s War was carefully adapted to today’s Hollywood taste by inventing subplots about “racism” against black American soldiers. It seems unlikely that these particular fables will be included in the latest criminal investigation in Germany, but the entire charade (in both cases) has a blatantly political purpose.
Fables about blacks in the Second World War are invented, just as blacks are inserted into films about Tudor England or the Battle of Hastings or the siege of Troy, because it is considered essential to brainwash 21st century youth into accepting multiracial societies as natural and normal.
And fables about the supposed evils of the Third Reich have to be sustained in 2025, even by absurd “criminal investigations” of 100-year-olds, because of the overriding fear of national socialism.
Why is national socialism still so feared more than eighty years after Adolf Hitler’s death?
Perhaps because amid the evident collapse of postwar Europe’s “democratic” and multiracial model, national socialism still shines as an organic, living ideology based on nature and civilization.
